Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IT OFTEN HAPPENS IN SCHOLARSHIP that a correct view is supplanted by an incorrect one, and can only be reestablished by the consideration of old evidence or the production of new: recentiores non potiores. The present study concerns a monument from imperial Athens which has been subjected to a variety of interpretations; the original one, often though not entirely unheeded, can be now supported by evidence from Pamphylia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher P. Jones (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: