Why the study?
The high rate of false-positive ARR results and PA cases lacking persistently elevated baseline aldosterone levels necessitates evaluating confirmatory testing strategies in the diagnostic work-up of PA.
What is the role and performance of confirmatory dynamic tests in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients?
What is the role and performance of confirmatory dynamic tests in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients?
Confirmatory dynamic tests remain an important step in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism to rule out false-positive screening results, though further prospective studies are needed to optimize diagnostic strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ARR screening limitations for PA require confirmatory testing; leaves open refined thresholds in broad hypertension populations.
The strategy for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the hypertensive population includes firstly a screening step, based on the measurement of plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), a test which must have high sensitivity, and secondly a confirmatory step based on the demonstration of excessive aldosterone production independent of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity. The high proportion of false-positive ARR results and conversely of actual PA without a persistent elevation in baseline plasma aldosterone concentration necessitates the addition of a confirmatory step in the work-up of PA diagnosis. The present review focuses on the description of the different dynamic tests available for demonstrating autonomy of aldosterone secretion, on the performance and limitations of confirmatory tests and on possible strategies for PA diagnosis which may either include or avoid the confirmatory step for PA diagnosis. Large prospective studies comparing different strategies with and without dynamic testing are mandatory to delineate clearly the role and limits of confirmatory tests in the work-up of PA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morera et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: