Why the study?
Cuff-based oscillometric measurement of the augmentation index using Mobil-O-Graph showed low to moderate agreement with other devices, and its relation to left ventricular hypertrophy needed evaluation.
Does cuff-based oscillometric measurement of central hemodynamics using Mobil-O-Graph accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients?
Does cuff-based oscillometric measurement of central hemodynamics using Mobil-O-Graph accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients?
Cuff-based oscillometric measurement of central augmentation index using the Mobil-O-Graph device can accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cuff-based AIx may aid LVH evaluation in hypertensives; leaves open whether it matches tonometry for routine use.
Introduction: The augmentation index (AIx) or central systolic blood pressure (SBP), measured by radial applanation tonometry, has been reported to be independently associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in Japanese hypertensive patients. Cuff-based oscillometric measurement of the AIx using Mobil-O-Graph® showed a low or moderate agreement with the AIx measurement with other devices. Methods: The AIx measured using the Mobil-O-Graph was validated against the tonometric measurements of the radial AIx measured using HEM-9000AI in 110 normotensive healthy individuals (age, 21–76 years; 50 men). We investigated the relationship between the central hemodynamics assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph and LVH in 100 hypertensive patients (age, 54–75 years; 48 men), presenting a wall thickness of ≥11 mm and ≥10 mm in men and women, respectively. Results: Although the Mobil-O-Graph-measured central AIx showed no negative values, it correlated moderately with the HEM-9000AI-measured radial AIx (r = 0.602, p < 0.001) in the normotensive individuals. The hypertensive patients did not show a significant difference in the central SBP between the sexes, but the central AIx was lower in men than in women. The independent determinants influencing left ventricle (LV) mass index (LVMI) (R² = 0.362; adjusted R² = 0.329, p < 0.001) were heart rate (β = −0.568 ± 0.149, p < 0.001), central SBP (β = 0.290 ± 0.100, p = 0.005), and aortic root diameter (β = 1.355 ± 0.344, p = 0.001). Age (β = −0.025 ± 0.124, p = 0.841) and the central AIx (β = 0.120 ± 0.131, p = 0.361) were not independently associated with the LVMI. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the central AIx for the presence of LVH (LVMI >118 g/m² in men or >108 g/m² in women) was statistically significant in men (0.875, p < 0.001) but not in women (0.622, p = 0.132). In men, a central AIx of 28.06% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 80.0% for detecting LVH. Conclusions: AIx measurement in men provided useful prognostic information for the presence of LVH. Pulse-wave analysis assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph may be a valuable tool for detecting LVH in hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obayashi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: