Why the study?
NAFLD is a multisystem disease affecting the cardiovascular system, and this study aimed to determine its cardiac effects, including impulse conduction and ventricular repolarisation on ECG.
Does non-alcoholic fatty liver disease alter ventricular repolarisation and impulse conduction on ECG compared to having risk factors alone?
Does non-alcoholic fatty liver disease alter ventricular repolarisation and impulse conduction on ECG compared to having risk factors alone?
Patients with newly diagnosed NAFLD exhibit subclinical ECG abnormalities in ventricular repolarisation, suggesting a potential increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias.
NAFLD-associated repolarization changes on ECG may prompt closer cardiac surveillance; leaves open whether screening improves outcomes in this observational cohort.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a multisystem disease which can affect the cardiovascular system as well. We conducted this study to determine the cardiac effects of NAFLD such as conduction of impulse and ventricular repolarisation on electrocardiography (ECG). In this study, we recruited patients with risk factors for NAFLD (group I; n = 23) and NAFLD patients (group II; n = 74) from Shar Hospital in Sulaimani City, Iraq. We analysed anthropometric measurements, serum fasting lipid profile, glucose levels, liver enzymes, and ECG recordings. ECG recordings showed significantly longer PR intervals, significantly shorter QTcB and JTc intervals, and a higher Tp-e/QTcB ratio in group II patients than in group I patients. These abnormalities were not associated with risk factors for diabetes. The TQ duration was significantly correlated with serum alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.411, p < 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (r = 0.272, p = 0.019) levels. In our study, the presence of significant abnormalities in ventricular repolarisation suggests that patients with newly diagnosed NAFLD have subclinical cardiac stress and a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Nimer et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: