This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study investigates factors affecting student behaviour in HyFlex learning environments during the post-crisis period following the COVID-19 pandemic. We employed a mixed-methods survey design and analysed data from 228 students across 18 undergraduate programmes through a 19-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and t-tests were conducted. Quantitative analysis revealed increased interaction between instructors and students (r = .282; p < .001), among students (r = .233; p < .001), with course content (r = .284; p < .001), and overall (r = .340; p < .001), which is correlated with higher attendance. As interaction increased, student achievement also increased (r = .275; p < .001). Interest showed a small correlation with attendance (r = .220, p < .001). Attendance in foundational (core) courses was significantly lower than in other courses (t(226) = −5.786, p < .001; η2 = 0.129). In addition, students found face-to-face activities less necessary to pass a course (t(227) = 4.283, p < .001; η2 = 0.075). Qualitatively, 110 open-ended responses were analysed via inductive content analysis (open → axial → selective coding), achieving 93% coder agreement. Qualitative themes emphasised that attendance, which relates to engagement, is affected not just by student- and course-related factors but also by institution-, instructor-, location-, and curriculum-related factors. These findings expand factors, providing a comprehensive framework for optimising HyFlex course design. The study adds to research on attendance, engagement, and interaction in HyFlex environments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özgür Örün (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: