Why the study?
Evaluating LV diastolic function in patients with AF is challenging, prompting investigation into guideline diagnostic algorithms and the association between increased LAP and LV diastolic parameters.
Does the current guideline diagnostic algorithm for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction accurately estimate increased left atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the current guideline diagnostic algorithm for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction accurately estimate increased left atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The current guideline algorithm for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction does not accurately reflect increased left atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation, though medial E/e' may have modest predictive value in persistent AF.
Background and Objectives: The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the diagnostic algorithm for LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in the current guidelines and to evaluate the association between increased left atrial pressure (LAP) and LV diastolic parameters. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four patients with non-valvular AF and a preserved LV ejection fraction who had the same rhythm status on echocardiography and LAP measurements during catheter ablation were included. LV diastolic function was classified as normal, indeterminate, or LVDD according to the recent guidelines. Increased LAP was defined as mean LAP (mLAP) ≥15 mmHg. Results: The mLAP was not different among the normal, indeterminate, and LVDD groups. However, the prevalence of increased LAP was higher in the LVDD group. Among the LV diastolic parameters, only medial E/e' was independently associated with mLAP in the whole study population. In patients with persistent AF (PeAF), E/e' and e' were significantly associated with mLAP, whereas in paroxysmal AF (PAF), mLAP was not associated with the LV diastolic parameters but with left atrial conduit function. Conclusions: In general, increased LAP is known to be closely related with LVDD. However, the algorithm for LVDD from recent guidelines does not reflect well the increased LAP in AF patients. The diastolic parameters may aid in estimating the increased LAP in PeAF but may only have limited value for assessing increased LAP in PAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: