July 26, 2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthOpen Access

After SL-ET, O2Def, MRT, and SCamp decreased by 16.4% (p=0.008), 15.6% (p=0.004), and 35% (p=0.002), respectively, with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement compared to DL-ET.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

The study investigated the effects of single-leg versus double-leg high-intensity interval training on pulmonary VO2 kinetics during moderate- and heavy-intensity exercise in solid organ transplant recipients.

Does single-leg high-intensity interval training improve pulmonary V˙O2 kinetics as effectively as double-leg training in solid organ transplant recipients?

Population

33 solid organ transplant recipients (13 heart, 11 kidney, and 9 liver)

Comparison

Single-leg endurance training vs double-leg endurance training

Follow-up

24 sessions

Authors

ATAlessio del Torto CCCarlo Capelli RPRoberto Peressutti

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

SL-ET matches DL-ET for improving VO2 kinetics in transplant recipients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Structured PICO

Does single-leg high-intensity interval training improve pulmonary V˙O2 kinetics as effectively as double-leg training in solid organ transplant recipients?

Population

33 solid organ transplant recipients (13 heart transplant, 11 kidney transplant, 9 liver transplant)

Intervention

Single-leg high-intensity interval training (SL-ET) for 24 sessions

Comparator

Double-leg high-intensity interval training (DL-ET) for 24 sessions

Outcome

O2 deficit (O2Def) and mean response time (MRT) during square-wave moderate-intensity exercise, and amplitude of V˙O2p slow component (SCamp) during heavy intensity exercisesurrogate

Single-leg high-intensity interval training is as effective as double-leg training for improving pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in solid organ transplant recipients.

Cite This Study

Torto et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a766747d8eb58afc2bd2d7f https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159097

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

July 26, 2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthOpen Access

After SL-ET, O2Def, MRT, and SCamp decreased by 16.4% (p=0.008), 15.6% (p=0.004), and 35% (p=0.002), respectively, with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement compared to DL-ET.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does single-leg high-intensity interval training improve pulmonary V˙O2 kinetics as effectively as double-leg training in solid organ transplant recipients?

Population

33 solid organ transplant recipients (13 heart, 11 kidney, and 9 liver)

Comparison

Single-leg endurance training vs double-leg endurance training

Follow-up

24 sessions

Authors

ATAlessio del Torto CCCarlo Capelli RPRoberto Peressutti

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

SL-ET matches DL-ET for improving VO2 kinetics in transplant recipients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Structured PICO

Does single-leg high-intensity interval training improve pulmonary V˙O2 kinetics as effectively as double-leg training in solid organ transplant recipients?

Population

33 solid organ transplant recipients (13 heart transplant, 11 kidney transplant, 9 liver transplant)

Intervention

Single-leg high-intensity interval training (SL-ET) for 24 sessions

Comparator

Double-leg high-intensity interval training (DL-ET) for 24 sessions

Outcome

O2 deficit (O2Def) and mean response time (MRT) during square-wave moderate-intensity exercise, and amplitude of V˙O2p slow component (SCamp) during heavy intensity exercisesurrogate

Single-leg high-intensity interval training is as effective as double-leg training for improving pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in solid organ transplant recipients.

Cite This Study

Torto et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a766747d8eb58afc2bd2d7f https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159097

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark