Why the study?
Does right ventricular septal pacing improve LV dyssynchrony and longitudinal function compared to apical pacing in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia?
Population
103 patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia and preserved LV ejection fraction, and 50 age-matched control…
Comparison
Right ventricular septal pacing (RVS) vs Right ventricular apical pacing and age-matched…
Design
RCT, randomly assigned into 2 groups
Follow-up
acute (during RV pacing after insertion)
Authors
Loading...
Supports right ventricular septal over apical pacing to preserve LV longitudinal strain; extends RCT evidence for alternative sites in symptomatic bradyarrhythmia.
Does right ventricular septal pacing improve LV dyssynchrony and longitudinal function compared to apical pacing in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia?
Right ventricular septal pacing preserves global left ventricular longitudinal function and reduces dyssynchrony compared to apical pacing in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia.
Inoue et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: