Key result
Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echo Doppler shows high agreement with intracoronary flow wire for assessing CFR.
Why the study?
Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler is a novel noninvasive method to detect blood flow velocity and reserve in the LAD, but had not yet been validated against a gold-standard method.
Does contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler accurately measure coronary flow reserve in the LAD compared to intracoronary Doppler flow wire in patients undergoing CFR assessment?
Observational (n=25)
Does contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler accurately measure coronary flow reserve in the LAD compared to intracoronary Doppler flow wire in patients undergoing CFR assessment?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler is a feasible, reliable, and reproducible noninvasive method for assessing coronary flow reserve in the LAD.
OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) as assessed by a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) is in agreement with CFR measurements assessed by intracoronary Doppler flow wire. BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler is a novel noninvasive method to detect blood flow velocity and reserve in the LAD. However, it has not yet been validated versus a gold-standard method. METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing CFR assessment in the LAD by Doppler flow wire were also evaluated by contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler to record blood flow in the distal LAD at rest and during hyperemia obtained by adenosine i.v. infusion. In five patients CFR was evaluated twice (before and after angioplasty). RESULTS: As a result of the combined use of i.v. contrast and second harmonic Doppler technology, feasibility in assessing coronary flow reserve equaled 100%. The agreement between the two methods was high. In fact, in all but five patients the maximum difference between the two CFR measurements was 0.38. Overall, the prediction (95%) interval of individual differences was -0.69 to +0.72. Reproducibility of CFR measurements was also high. The limits of the agreement (95%) between the two measurements were -0.32 to +0.32. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary flow reserve in the LAD as assessed by contrast-enhanced transthoracic echo Doppler along with harmonic mode concurs very closely with Doppler flow wire CFR measurements. This new noninvasive method allows feasible, reliable and reproducible assessment of CFR in the LAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caiati et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing coronary flow reserve assessment (n=25). Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler vs. Intracoronary Doppler flow wire was evaluated on Agreement between CFR measurements assessed by contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler and intracoronary Doppler flow wire (95% CI -0.69 to +0.72). Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler showed high agreement with intracoronary Doppler flow wire for assessing coronary flow reserve (95% prediction interval -0.69 to +0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: