Why the study?
Does 10 minutes of rope skipping improve cardiovascular efficiency comparably to 30 minutes of jogging in sedentary volunteers?
Does 10 minutes of rope skipping improve cardiovascular efficiency comparably to 30 minutes of jogging in sedentary volunteers?
Ten minutes of rope skipping does not elicit a cardiovascular training response comparable to 30 minutes of jogging and is associated with higher injury rates.
Rope skipping yields smaller VO2 gains than jogging in sedentary adults; leaves open its comparative value and safety in larger randomized trials.
In brief: It has been suggested that ten minutes of rope skipping is equal to 30 minutes of jogging for improved cardiovascular efficiency. This study compared physiological adaptations to six-week programs of jogging and rope skipping. Twenty-six sedentary volunteers (17 women and nine men) aged 18 to 35 years were assigned to a jogging, rope-skipping, or control group. Training frequency was five times per week; each session was 30 minutes for the jogging group and ten minutes for the rope-skipping groups. Significant differences (p <.05) in o2 max were observed in each group. o2 max increased 5.1 ml· kg(-1)· min(-1) for the jogging group (13%) and 2.8 ml· kg(-1)· min(-1) for the rope-skipping group (7%). The rope-skipping group had higher injury and drop-out rates. It was concluded that ten minutes of rope skipping does not elicit a training response comparable to 30 minutes of jogging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buyze et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: