Key result
Acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients was associated with significantly impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to patients without rejection (MD -1.96).
Why the study?
Due to the costs and potential complications of surveillance endomyocardial biopsy for acute cellular rejection, non-invasive screening methods are needed.
Does speckle-tracking echocardiography detect acute cellular rejection in heart transplant patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=915)
Does speckle-tracking echocardiography detect acute cellular rejection in heart transplant patients?
Mean Difference: -1.96 (95% CI -2.85–-1.07)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Speckle-tracking echocardiography demonstrates significant impairment in left and right ventricular strain during acute cellular rejection, suggesting its potential as a non-invasive rule-out screening tool to reduce the need for routine endomyocardial biopsies.
Speckle-tracking strain may aid non-invasive ACR screening post-transplant; supports prospective validation trials before EMB replacement.
After a cardiac transplantation, the steering of immunosuppression requires an active search for acute cellular rejection (ACR). Surveillance with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard. Given the costs and potential complications, there is growing interest in the use of non-invasive screening methods. Thus, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of speckle-tracking echocardiography as a screening method for ACR. We searched PubMed (CENTRAL) and gray literature for studies presenting data on speckle tracking echocardiography in heart-transplant patients experiencing acute cellular rejection. The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis were left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. We used random effects models for all our calculations. We pre-registered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42024508654). By incorporating data from over 2000 biopsies included in 18 studies, we found that both left (LVGLS, MD -1.96, 95% CI -2.85 to -1.07, p < 0.0001), and right (RVGLS, MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.03 to -1.76, p < 0.00001) ventricular longitudinal strain were lower among patients without ACR. The change of LVGLS from baseline over time was also greater among patients experiencing ACR (MD -2.43, 95% CI -4.82 to -0.05, p = 0.045). Current data suggest that myocardial strain measured by speckle tracking echocardiography is affected in ACR and could potentially be used for early rejection detection as a rule-out strategy, leading to reduction of routine EMB in heart transplant follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xourgia et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation (n=915). Acute cellular rejection vs. No acute cellular rejection was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (MD -1.96, 95% CI -2.85 to -1.07, p=<0.0001). Acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients was associated with significantly impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to patients without rejection (MD -1.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: