Why the study?
Does ZK-807834 reduce arterial and venous thrombosis in rabbit models compared to other anticoagulants?
Does ZK-807834 reduce arterial and venous thrombosis in rabbit models compared to other anticoagulants?
ZK-807834 attenuates arterial and venous thrombosis in rabbits at lower dosages and with less systemic hemostasis perturbation than available agents.
Supports ZK-807834 development in thrombosis models; leaves open clinical translation pending human studies.
Inhibition of factor Xa (FXa) may interrupt thrombus progression. This study compared the antithrombotic activity of a novel FXa inhibitor, ZK-807834 [MW, 527 D; Ki (human FXa), 0.11 nM], with recombinant tick anticoagulant peptide [rTAP; MW, 6,685 D; Ki, (human FXa) = 0.28 nM], and DX-9065a [MW 445 D, Ki (human FXa), 40 nM] in rabbits with arterial thrombosis induced by electrical vascular injury. ZK-807834 also was compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; MW, 5,500 D) during venous thrombosis induced by placing a copper wire and threads in the vena cava. Inhibitors were administered as an i.v. bolus and 2-h infusion. Total dosages of ZK-807834, > or =0.7 micromol/kg (n = 18); rTAP, > or =1 micromol/kg (n = 18); or DX-9065a, > or =11 micromol/kg (n = 18) decreased the incidence of arterial thrombotic occlusion compared with control animals (p < 0.05). However, five of six animals given the lowest effective dosage of rTAP and four of six animals given DX-9065a bled from a surgical incision >5 min, but only two of six animals given ZK-807834 bled >5 min. Venous clot weights were reduced compared with controls for dosages of ZK-807834 > or =0.007 micromol/kg (n = 36) or LMWH > or =0.2 micromol/kg (n = 18). Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were unchanged from baseline at the minimally effective dose of ZK-807834, whereas aPTT was increased twofold at the effective dose of LMWH. Thus ZK-807834 may be useful to attenuate thrombosis at lower dosages and with less perturbation of systemic hemostasis compared with available agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abendschein et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: