Key result
Double-gated myocardial ASL significantly reduced global physiological noise compared to single-gated ASL (0.11 vs 0.20 mL/g/min; P=0.01) and increased temporal SNR.
Why the study?
Does double-gated myocardial ASL perfusion imaging reduce physiological noise and improve temporal SNR compared to single-gated imaging in healthy volunteers and heart transplant recipients?
RCT (n=18)
Randomized order
Does double-gated myocardial ASL perfusion imaging reduce physiological noise and improve temporal SNR compared to single-gated imaging in healthy volunteers and heart transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.11% vs 0.2%
p-value: p=0.01
Double-gated myocardial ASL perfusion imaging significantly reduces physiological noise and improves temporal SNR compared to single-gated methods, independent of heart rate variation.
Double-gating may improve myocardial ASL reliability; leaves open clinical translation for patient perfusion assessment.
PURPOSE: Cardiac motion is a dominant source of physiological noise (PN) in myocardial arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion imaging. This study investigates the sensitivity to heart rate variation (HRV) of double-gated myocardial ASL compared with the more widely used single-gated method. METHODS: Double-gating and single-gating were performed on 10 healthy volunteers (n = 10, 3F/7M; age, 23-34 years) and eight heart transplant recipients (n = 8, 1F/7M; age, 26-76 years) at rest in the randomized order. Myocardial blood flow (MBF), PN, temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and HRV were measured. RESULTS: HRV ranged from 0.2 to 7.8 bpm. Double-gating PN did not depend on HRV, while single-gating PN increased with HRV. Over all subjects, double-gating provided a significant reduction in global PN (from 0.20 ± 0.15 to 0.11 ± 0.03 mL/g/min; P = 0.01) and per-segment PN (from 0.33 ± 0.23 to 0.21 ± 0.12 mL/g/min; P < 0.001), with significant increases in global temporal SNR (from 11 ± 8 to 18 ± 8; P = 0.02) and per-segment temporal SNR (from 7 ± 4 to 11 ± 12; P < 0.001) without significant difference in measured MBF. CONCLUSION: Single-gated myocardial ASL suffers from reduced temporal SNR, while double-gated myocardial ASL provides consistent temporal SNR independent of HRV. Magn Reson Med 77:1975-1980, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers and heart transplant recipients (n=18). Double-gated myocardial ASL vs. Single-gated myocardial ASL was evaluated on Global physiological noise (PN) (p=0.01). Double-gated myocardial ASL significantly reduced global physiological noise compared to single-gated ASL (0.11 vs 0.20 mL/g/min; P=0.01) and increased temporal SNR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: