Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure from 30.9 mmHg to 22.87 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in a patient with advanced heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart failure management increasingly focuses on device-based therapies, prompting evaluation of combining cardiac contractility modulation with continuous pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in advanced disease.
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy reduce pulmonary artery pressure in a patient with advanced HFrEF?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy reduce pulmonary artery pressure in a patient with advanced HFrEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 22.87% vs 30.9%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In a patient with advanced HFrEF, cardiac contractility modulation therapy significantly reduced pulmonary artery pressures as continuously monitored by a CardioMEMS device, suggesting a novel multistep device-based approach.
Supports feasibility of combined Optimizer Smart and CardioMEMS in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating, prospective trials needed before adoption.
During the last years, the management of heart failure (HF) made substantial progress, focusing on device-based therapies to meet the demands of this complex syndrome. In this case report, we present a multistep approach to deal with HF. Specifically, we report the first patient subjected to the implantation of both Optimizer Smart ® (Impulse Dynamics Inc., Marlton, NJ, USA) and CardioMEMS devices. A 72-year-old male patient with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was admitted to our cardiology department in January 2021, following a progressive shortening of the time between hospitalizations for levosimendan infusions. Specifically, the patient was monitored daily by CardioMEMS, and a strategy of levosimendan infusions guided by the device had been adopted. He was also a carrier of MitraClips and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and had optimized HF medical therapy. In January 2021, the patient implanted Optimizer Smart ® device for cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy because of poor response to therapy and elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). CCM significantly reduced PAP values following discharge (systolic PAP 33.67 ± 2.92 vs. 40.6 ± 3.37 mmHg, diastolic PAP 14.5 ± 2.01 vs. 22.5 ± 2.53 mmHg, mean PAP 22.87 ± 2.20 vs. 30.9 ± 2.99 mmHg, HR 60.93 ± 1.53 vs. 80.83 ± 3.66 bpm; p < 0.0001), with persisting effect at 9 months. The usefulness of CCM is objectively demonstrated for the first time by continuous invasive monitoring of PAP by CardioMEMS, which can suggest the correct timing for CCM implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Visco et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Advanced Heart Failure (n=1). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy vs. Pre-implantation baseline was evaluated on Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) (p=<0.0001). Cardiac contractility modulation therapy significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure from 30.9 mmHg to 22.87 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in a patient with advanced heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: