Nitric oxide donors exert a small but significant positive chronotropic effect in vivo independent of the autonomic nervous system, likely by stimulating the hyperpolarization-activated current (I(f)).
Supports I(f) mediation of NO donor chronotropy in animals; leaves open human translation and clinical relevance.
Administration of nitric oxide (NO) donors in vivo is accompanied by a baroreflex-mediated increase in heart rate (HR). In vitro, however, NO donors can increase HR directly by stimulating a pathway that involves NO, cGMP, and the hyperpolarization-activated current (I(f)). The aim of this study was to assess the functional significance of this pathway in vivo by testing whether NO donors can increase HR in the anesthetized rabbit independent of the autonomic nervous system. New Zealand White rabbits were vagotomized, cardiac sympathectomized, and treated with propranolol (0.3 mg/kg iv). The NO donor molsidomine (0.2 mg/kg iv) caused a progressive increase (Delta) in HR (DeltaHR, 14 +/- 3 beats/min; P < 0.01). This effect was significantly reduced by the I(f) blocker ZD-7288 (0.2 mg/kg iv; DeltaHR, 2 +/- 3 beats/min; P = not significant). Similar results were seen with sodium nitroprusside. The positive chronotropic effect of sodium nitroprusside (50 microM) was confirmed in the isolated working rabbit heart preparation (DeltaHR, 17 +/- 3 beats/min; P < 0.01). In conclusion, NO donors exert a small, but significant, positive chronotropic effect in vivo that is independent of the autonomic nervous system. These results are also consistent with data in sinoatrial node cells that show that NO donors increase HR by stimulating I(f).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hogan et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: