Why the study?
Does intravenous almokalant improve the termination and suppress inducibility of tachycardia in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias?
Does intravenous almokalant improve the termination and suppress inducibility of tachycardia in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias?
Almokalant demonstrates a dose-dependent efficacy in terminating and preventing the induction of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, though high doses carry a risk of proarrhythmia such as torsade de pointes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Almokalant may aid acute PSVT termination and suppression; confirms dose-dependent IKr blockade efficacy but requires proarrhythmia safety assessment.
Almokalant is a newly developed selective blocker of the delayed outward K+ current and exhibits the electrophysiological properties of a class III antiarrhythmic agent. In a Scandinavian multicenter, placebocontrolled trial, the antiarrhythmic efficacy of almokalant was investigated in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: 87 patients with mean age of 50 ± 14 years (range 21–71 years), with reciprocating tachycardia due to either Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome (n = 58) or atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) (n = 29) were studied with transesophageal atrial stimulation. After a baseline procedure, during which sustained tachycardia was induced and overdrive terminated, tachycardia was reinduced and an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of either placebo or almokalant (aiming at a pseudoequilibrium plasma level of 20, 50, 100, or 150 nM) (Cpl 20-Cpl 150), was administered. Each patient was studied at two Cpl. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to either placebo + almokalant at Cpl 20 or Cpl 20 + Cpl 50; 26 patients were studied openly at Cpl 50 + Cpl 100, and 22 were studied openly at Cpl 100 + Cpl 150 almokalant. The antiarrhythmic efficacy was assessed as the ability to terminate induced tachycardia and to suppress inducibility: The proportion of patients in which the tachycardia was terminated was placebo 3 of 20 (15%); Cpl 20, 7 of 36 (19%): Cpl 50, 10 of 36 (28%); Cpl 100, 14 of 35 (40%); and Cpl 150, 5 of 9 (56%). The proportion of patients in which the tachycardia became noninducible was placebo 0 of 20 (0%); Cpl 20, 10 of 36 (28%); Cpl 50, 12 of 36 (33%); Cpl 100, 17 of 39 (44%); and Cpl 150, 12 of 18 (67%). As compared with placebo, there was a significant increase in the ability to suppress induction of tachycardia at ≥Cpl 20 nM and a significant increase in the ability to terminate induced tachycardia at Cpl ≥100 nM. There was a significant trend (Cochran-Armitage trend test) toward increasing antiarrhythmic efficacy with increasing doses. One patient, who was studied at the highest dose level, developed markedly prolonged QT intervals and a torsade de pointes tachycardia that required direct current (DC) conversion. Almokalant exhibited a significant dose-dependent antiarrhythmic effect with regard to tachycardia termination and suppressed inducibility in patients with supraventricular reciprocating tachycardias. One patient developed torsade de pointes, underscoring the need for a better understanding of the prerequisites of this proarrhythmic response with almokalant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darpö et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: