Key result
Aortic stiffness assessed by 2D strain imaging correlated strongly with age, with peak circumferential strain rate decreasing significantly in older patients (r=-0.87, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does two-dimensional strain imaging accurately evaluate aortic stiffness relative to aging in normal patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=39)
Does two-dimensional strain imaging accurately evaluate aortic stiffness relative to aging in normal patients?
Effect estimate: r=-0.87
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Two-dimensional strain imaging of the abdominal aorta provides a simple and accurate method to determine aortic stiffness and its correlation with aging.
Offers potential noninvasive aortic assessment in normals; leaves open prospective validation against outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been demonstrated that aortic stiffness is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The objective of the present study was to accurately evaluate the aortic stiffness relative to the changes in aging using two-dimensional (2D) strain imaging in 39 comparatively normal patients (15-85 years). METHODS: We obtained short-axis images of the abdominal aorta (Ao) and determined the peak circumferential strain (Ao-S) and strain rate (Ao-SR) and the time from Q-wave of electrocardiogram to peak Ao-S using the 2D strain imaging. The stiffness parameters beta(1) and beta(2) of the abdominal aorta were measured using M-mode ultrasonography and 2D strain imaging, respectively. RESULTS: The stiffness parameters beta(1) and beta(2) correlated significantly with age (r=0.51, P < 0.001 and r=0.69, P < 0.0001, respectively), particularly the latter parameter beta(2). The peak circumferential Ao-S and Ao-SR correlated strongly with age (r=-0.79, P < 0.0001 and r=-0.87, P < 0.0001, respectively). The stiffness parameter beta(1) was significantly greater in the old-aged group (>60 years) than in the young-aged group (<30 years). The peak circumferential Ao-S and Ao-SR were significantly lower in the middle-aged (30-60 years) and old-aged groups than in the young-aged group. CONCLUSION: The aortic circumferential strain and strain rate measured by 2D strain imaging allow simple and accurate determination of the aortic stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oishi et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Comparatively normal patients (n=39). Aging was evaluated on Correlation of peak circumferential strain rate (Ao-SR) with age (r=-0.87, p=< 0.0001). Aortic stiffness assessed by 2D strain imaging correlated strongly with age, with peak circumferential strain rate decreasing significantly in older patients (r=-0.87, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: