Key result
Bioresorbable scaffolds offer potential advantages over metallic stents, such as avoiding vessel caging and late stent thrombosis, in the management of coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Do bioresorbable scaffolds improve outcomes compared to metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Do bioresorbable scaffolds improve outcomes compared to metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
This review summarizes the current evidence and potential advantages of bioresorbable scaffolds over permanent metallic stents in the management of coronary artery disease.
Drawbacks of permanent metallic DES in PCI may limit long-term vessel function; leaves open the role of bioresorbable platforms pending prospective data.
New-generation drug-eluting stents are recommended as the default option in all clinical conditions and lesion subsets in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). On the other hand, despite achieving very good results in the rate of restenosis, permanent delivery of a metallic platform is affected by several drawbacks, such as caging of the vessel, side branch jailing, impairment of vasomotion, and the impossibility of lumen enlargement. Also, the presence of residual foreign material may increase the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis and support the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. These pending limitations of metallic stents can be addressed by the implantation of bioresorbable scaf-folds (BRSs). At present, there are numerous devices available for preclinical or clinical evaluation. This review discusses the evidence for BRS in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dziewierz et al. (2018) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. Metallic stents was evaluated. Bioresorbable scaffolds offer potential advantages over metallic stents, such as avoiding vessel caging and late stent thrombosis, in the management of coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: