Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 1962Journal of Applied Physiology

Comparison of computed aortic blood velocity with that of electromagnetic flowmeter

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WJWilliam B. JonesParsons (United States)JGJames B. GriffinCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May enable pressure-based aortic flow estimation in dogs; leaves open human validation and clinical adoption.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Jones et al. (1962) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a79643fbdf697b3de02383bhttps://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.3.482
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blood flow in arteries determined transcutaneously by an ultrasonic doppler velocitymeter as compared to electromagnetic measurements on the exposed vessels1980 · 54 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of a new catheter‐mounted electromagnetic velocity sensor during cardiac catheterization1980 · 29 citations
  3. 3An Electric Device for Instantaneous and Continuous Computation of Aortic Blood Velocity1957 · 44 citations
  4. 4The Aortic Flow Pulse as Related to Differential Pressure1956 · 41 citations
  5. 5Experimental validation of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of volume flow through the stenotic aortic valve.1988 · 55 citations