Why the study?
Does Ro 40-5967 have a more favorable vasodilator to inotropic profile compared to verapamil in vitro?
Does Ro 40-5967 have a more favorable vasodilator to inotropic profile compared to verapamil in vitro?
Ro 40-5967 demonstrates a preference for coronary vasculature vasodilation with weak negative inotropic effects compared to verapamil in vitro.
Ro 40-5967's coronary selectivity merits further preclinical testing; leaves open clinical translation versus verapamil.
Summary: Ro 40-5967 is a structurally novel Ca2+ channel blocker which binds to the verapamil-type receptor of cardiac membranes. Its biological activity was investigated in comparison with verapamil in isolated vascular, cardiac, and gastrointestinal muscle preparations, as well as in isolated perfused hearts. Ro 40-5967 was more potent in increasing coronary artery flow (EC50 = 54 nM) than in suppressing myocardial (IC50 = 14,000 nM) and peripheral vascular (aortic) contractility halfmaximal inhibition (IC50 = 275 nM). In contrast, verapamil was equally potent in affecting all three variables. These observations demonstrate an apparent preference of Ro 40-5967 for the coronary vasculature, as opposed to verapamil, in vitro. Results also suggest that Ro 40-5967 is less potent than verapamil in gastrointestinal smooth muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osterrieder et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: