Why the study?
Repeated procedures are often required for long-term success of atrial fibrillation ablation, but data regarding the use of the cryoballoon for repeat procedures are scarce.
Does the index ablation modality (cryoballoon vs radiofrequency) affect pulmonary vein reconnection patterns and long-term freedom from AF when using second-generation cryoballoon for repeat ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation?
Does the index ablation modality (cryoballoon vs radiofrequency) affect pulmonary vein reconnection patterns and long-term freedom from AF when using second-generation cryoballoon for repeat ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation?
Second-generation cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation, yielding similar long-term success rates regardless of whether the index procedure utilized radiofrequency or cryoballoon.
Second-generation cryoballoon redo ablation was associated with fewer PV reconnections; leaves open whether it improves outcomes versus RF redo.
INTRODUCTION: Repeated procedures are often needed for long-term success of atrial fibrillation ablation. There are scarce data regarding cryoballoon use for such procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed acute effect and long-term follow-up of second-generation cryoballoon ablation, performed as a repeat procedure after an index radiofrequency vs cryoballoon ablation. Sixty-one patients from three centers were included. In 36 cases radiofrequency (RF-I) and in 25 cryoballoon ablation (CB-I) was the index procedure. During redo procedure, pulmonary vein reconnection was less frequent in CB-I vs RF-I (51.5% vs 66.9%; P = 0.017). After cryoballoon, left inferior (P = 0.027) and right superior (P = 0.06) pulmonary veins were less likely to exhibit reconnection. Moreover, patients after initial RF ablation frequently presented multiple-vein reconnection (P = 0.018), while patients after cryoablation more often had only one vein reconnected (P = 0.008). During reablation procedures, all 149 reconnected veins in both groups were isolated, with no differences in procedural parameters, except for procedure time, shorter in CB-I group (65.5 vs 71.1 minutes; P = 0.04). Transient phrenic nerve palsy was the only complication in both groups (5.6% and 8.0%; ns). After mean follow-up of 15 ± 9 months, 70.3% of patients were free from atrial fibrillation (AF), with no differences between the groups (P = 0.71). In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the persistent form of arrhythmia (P = 0.009) and relapse in the blanking period (P = 0.0004) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of second-generation cryoballoon is associated with less frequent pulmonary vein reconnection compared with RF ablation. Cryoballoon is safe and effective for repeated AF ablation, regardless of the technique used for the initial procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Główniak et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: