Why the study?
The study was conducted to apply CMR 4D flow to evaluate left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in atrial fibrillation.
Does CMR 4D flow assessment reveal differences in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to healthy participants?
Does CMR 4D flow assessment reveal differences in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to healthy participants?
CMR 4D flow reveals distinct left ventricular flow patterns in atrial fibrillation patients, providing novel imaging biomarkers for systolic and diastolic function.
May enable 4D flow CMR assessment of LV function in AF; leaves open clinical adoption pending validation.
Purpose: Applicating cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) 4D flow to evaluate left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: In this study, from May 2021 to October 2021, 26 AF patients and 15 healthy participants were recruited and underwent multiparametric CMR and echocardiogram scans before discharge. The CMR protocol incorporated an assessment of 4D flow, cardiac function. Notably, the AF patients maintained irregular heart rhythm during the CMR scan. The 4D flow components were compared with echocardiogram results. Results: AF patients had a lower proportion of direct flow (33.5% (8.43; 47.5) in AF vs. 69.1% (63.4; 74.4) in healthy), higher delayed ejection (24.1±12% in AF vs. 14.7±6.8% in healthy), retained inflow (32.5% (24.6; 36.9) in AF vs. 14.5% (12.5; 18.2) in healthy) and residual volume (4.73% (1.47; 15.0) in AF vs. 0.62% (0.46; 1.62) in healthy). A high correlation was observed between flow EF and CMR EF (R=0.78, P<0.001) in AF patients. The mean bias among the methods was higher for flow EF than CMR EF (24.86%). Multivariable linear regression showed that the correlation between retained inflow and E/e’ (β=0.152, P=0.048) remained significant when adjusted for confounders. Direct flow (β= -0.170, P=0.038) and retained inflow (β=0.350, P=0.024) significantly correlated with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score. Conclusion: CMR 4D flow component revealed a significantly different flow pattern in AF patients compared with healthy participants and provided de novo flow biomarker indicating LV systolic function (direct flow and flow EF) and diastolic function (retained inflow).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: