Key result
In outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction of ischemic etiology, higher BMI was not a protective factor against all-cause mortality, contradicting the obesity paradox.
Why the study?
Several studies suggest an obesity paradox in heart failure prognosis, prompting investigation into the association between BMI and mortality specifically in outpatients with HFREF of ischemic etiology.
Does obesity (higher BMI) improve survival in outpatients with HFrEF of ischemic etiology?
Observational (n=242)
No
Does obesity (higher BMI) improve survival in outpatients with HFrEF of ischemic etiology?
p-value: p=0.123
In outpatients with HFrEF of ischemic etiology, higher BMI was not associated with a survival benefit, challenging the existence of the obesity paradox in this specific population.
Observational BMI-mortality link in ischemic HFrEF warrants no practice change; leaves open the obesity paradox for prospective validation.
Background The obesity occurrence has achieved epidemic levels worldwide and several studies indicate a paradoxical similarity among obesity and the prognosis in heart failure (HF). The primary objective was to understand the association between body mass index (BMI) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) of ischemic etiology in outpatients, using mortality as a parameter. The secondary objectives were to determine the differences in HF functional class, pharmacological therapy and evaluate the prognostic value of MAGGIC Score in this population. Methods We analyzed 1,556 medical records from the HF outpatient clinic of a quaternary hospital and 242 were selected according to the criteria. Most were male, average age 62.6 (56–70), BMI 18.5–24.9 = 35.1%, 25–29.9 = 37.2%, 30–34.9 = 17.8%, 35–39.9 = 7%; BMI <18.5 and >40 groups were eliminated from the central analyzes because of scarce testing. Results BMI 30–34.9 and BMI 18.5–24.9 had the best prognosis, BMI 25–29.9 had an average performance, and BMI –39.9 group provided the worst outcome ( p = 0.123). In the subcategory analysis, BMI 30–34.9 group had a better prognosis compared to the BMI 35–39.9 group ( p = 0.033). In the multivariate analysis The MAGGIC score was not able to foretell mortality in this population according to BMI. Conclusion In not hospitalized patients with HFREF of ischemic etiology, obesity was not a protective factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvino et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of ischemic etiology (n=242). Body mass index (BMI) vs. Grade I obesity (BMI 30-34.9) or Eutrophic (BMI 18.5-24.9) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=0.123). In outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction of ischemic etiology, higher BMI was not a protective factor against all-cause mortality, contradicting the obesity paradox.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: