Key result
Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management yielded a cardiovascular composite endpoint incidence of 4.4% versus 8.6% for usual care over 5 years (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21-1.13; P=0.09).
Why the study?
Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading contributor to cardiovascular disease, prompting long-term evaluation of cardiovascular events and costs after 12 months of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management.
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management reduce cardiovascular events and costs in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT (n=450)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management reduce cardiovascular events and costs in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Odds Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.21–1.13)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.4% vs 8.6%
p-value: p=0.09
Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management for uncontrolled hypertension showed a non-significant trend toward reduced cardiovascular events over 5 years, while demonstrating substantial estimated cost savings.
Telemonitoring plus pharmacist management does not significantly reduce cardiovascular events; leaves open a potential benefit for larger trials.
Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading contributor to cardiovascular disease. A cluster-randomized trial in 16 primary care clinics showed that 12 months of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management lowered blood pressure more than usual care (UC) for 24 months. We report cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalized heart failure, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death) and costs over 5 years of follow-up. In the telemonitoring intervention (TI group, n=228), there were 15 cardiovascular events (5 myocardial infarction, 4 stroke, 5 heart failure, 1 cardiovascular death) among 10 patients. In UC group (n=222), there were 26 events (11 myocardial infarction, 12 stroke, 3 heart failure) among 19 patients. The cardiovascular composite end point incidence was 4.4% in the TI group versus 8.6% in the UC group (odds ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.21–1.13], P =0.09). Including 2 coronary revascularizations in the TI group and 10 in the UC group, the secondary cardiovascular composite end point incidence was 5.3% in the TI group versus 10.4% in the UC group (odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.22–1.08], P =0.08). Microsimulation modeling showed the difference in events far exceeded predictions based on observed blood pressure. Intervention costs (in 2017 US dollars) were $1511 per patient. Over 5 years, estimated event costs were $758 000 in the TI group and $1 538 000 in the UC group for a return on investment of 126% and a net cost savings of about $1900 per patient. Telemonitoring with pharmacist management lowered blood pressure and may have reduced costs by avoiding cardiovascular events over 5 years. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00781365.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margolis et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=450). Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management vs. Usual care was evaluated on Cardiovascular composite end point (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.21-1.13, p=0.09). Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management yielded a cardiovascular composite endpoint incidence of 4.4% versus 8.6% for usual care over 5 years (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21-1.13; P=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: