Key result
Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management lowered total medical costs by an average of $281 per person compared to usual care (not statistically significant).
Why the study?
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management reduce medical costs in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT
cluster
Does home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management reduce medical costs in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Mean Difference: -281
p-value: p=not statistically significant
Home blood pressure monitoring and pharmacist case management can be implemented without increasing overall medical care costs.
Supports pharmacist-led telemonitoring programs in hypertension practice; extends efficacy data with RCT economic evidence.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-managed (team-based) care for hypertension with home blood pressure monitoring support interventions have been widely studied and shown to be effective in improving rates of hypertension control and lowering blood pressure; however, few studies have evaluated the economic considerations related to bringing these programs into usual practice. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the economic outcomes of the Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure (Hyperlink) study, a cluster randomized controlled trial which used home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management to achieve better blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS: A prospective analysis compared differences in medical costs and encounters in the Hyperlink telemonitoring intervention and usual care groups in the 12 months pre- and post-enrollment using medical and pharmacy insurance claims from a health care sector perspective. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate differences between groups over time. These results, combined with previously published prospective study results on intervention costs and blood pressure outcomes, were used to estimate cost-effectiveness measures for blood pressure control and reduction. FINDINGS: Total medical costs in the intervention group were lower compared with the usual care group by an average of $281 per person, but this difference was not statistically significant. Clinic-based office visit, radiology, pharmacy, and hospital costs were also non-significantly lower in the intervention group. Statistically significant differences were found in lipid-related laboratory costs (higher) and in hypertension- (higher) and lipid-related (lower) pharmacy costs. Patterns in medical costs were similar for medical encounters. On average, the intervention cost $7337 per person achieving hypertension control and $139 or $265 per mm Hg reduction in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Home blood pressure monitoring and pharmacist case management to improve hypertension care can be implemented without increasing, and potentially reducing, overall medical care costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dehmer et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in uncontrolled hypertension. Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management vs. usual care was evaluated on Total medical costs (MD -$281, p=not statistically significant). Home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management lowered total medical costs by an average of $281 per person compared to usual care (not statistically significant).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: