Key result
Levosimendan produced a greater increase in cardiac output at 24 hours compared to PGE1, while PGE1 resulted in a more sustained decrease in BNP levels at 1 week.
Why the study?
Does a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan improve hemodynamic parameters and BNP levels compared to prostaglandin E1 in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=73)
Does a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan improve hemodynamic parameters and BNP levels compared to prostaglandin E1 in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure?
Levosimendan provides a greater short-term increase in cardiac output, whereas prostaglandin E1 offers a more sustained reduction in BNP in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Favors levosimendan for acute output gains but PGE1 for sustained BNP effects; extends comparative inotrope data in decompensated HF.
BACKGROUND: Both levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) have beneficial effects on hemodynamic parameters and outcome compared to dobutamine in decompensated chronic heart failure (CHF). AIMS: We compared short-term effects of levosimendan versus PGE1 on hemodynamic parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) in patients with decompensated CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: 73 patients (cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCP) >15 mmHg) with decompensated CHF were randomised to treatment with either a 24 h-infusion of levosimendan (n=38) or a chronic infusion of PGE1 (n = 35). Hemodynamic parameters and BNP were measured at baseline, 24 and 48 h, BNP levels were also measured after 1 week. Baseline characteristics including concomitant medication were similar in both groups. Levosimendan and PGE1 increased cardiac output (CO) after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan increased CO twice as much as PGE1 (24 h: Levosimendan +1.1 +/- 0.1 L/min, PGE1 +0.6 +/- 0.1 L/min, p < 0.001). Both drugs produced a comparable reduction in PCP and pulmonary artery pressure after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan decreased BNP by 28% after 24 h and 22% after 48 h, but effects disappeared after 1 week. In contrast, PGE1 decreased BNP by 15% after 48 h (no change at 24 h), but a decrease of 20% was sustained at 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The differential beneficial effects of levosimendan (greater increase in CO) and PGE1 (sustained decrease in BNP) may have a potential impact on clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moertl et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Decompensated chronic heart failure (n=73). Levosimendan vs. Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) was evaluated on Cardiac output at 24 hours (p=< 0.001). Levosimendan produced a greater increase in cardiac output at 24 hours compared to PGE1, while PGE1 resulted in a more sustained decrease in BNP levels at 1 week.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: