Key result
Esaxerenone demonstrated a direct UACR-lowering effect independent of blood pressure lowering, with only 21.9-28.1% of the total effect mediated by changes in systolic blood pressure and eGFR.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio reduction by mineralocorticoid receptor blockers operates through mechanisms independent of blood pressure lowering.
Does esaxerenone reduce UACR independent of blood pressure lowering in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria?
Does esaxerenone reduce UACR independent of blood pressure lowering in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria?
Effect estimate: 28.1% (95% CI 18.2-41.4)
Esaxerenone reduces albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy primarily through a direct mechanism that is independent of its blood pressure-lowering effects.
May improve BP control in moderate CKD; leaves open BP-independent renoprotection in diabetic nephropathy.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended as first-line drugs for hypertension with diabetic nephropathy owing to their renoprotective effect; however, their effect beyond lowering blood pressure (BP) has not been confirmed. Recent studies have shown that aldosterone plays a key role in causing renal injury; therefore, it is likely that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockers inhibit aldosterone-induced renal damage in different ways from ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Therefore, we investigated the mechanism of the effect of an MR blocker on reducing the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) using data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (ESAX-DN) of a new nonsteroidal MR blocker, esaxerenone. This post hoc analysis used a novel statistical method to quantitatively estimate the effect of esaxerenone on UACR reduction mediated, or not mediated, by changes in systolic BP (SBP) and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The proportion of the mediated effect by SBP changes to the total effect on UACR reduction was 9.8-10.7%; the UACR was reduced to 0.903-0.911 times the baseline at the end of treatment through the SBP-related pathway and to 0.422-0.426 times the baseline through the non-SBP-related pathway. Even considering both SBP and eGFR simultaneously, the proportion of the mediated effect was 21.9-28.1%. These results confirm that esaxerenone has a direct UACR-lowering effect independent of BP lowering and that its magnitude is much larger than that of the BP-dependent effect. Thus, esaxerenone could be a UACR-reducing treatment option for patients with diabetic nephropathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okuda et al. (2022) studied Type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria (n=449). Esaxerenone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Proportion of UACR reduction mediated by SBP and eGFR changes (cumulative mean) (28.1%, 95% CI 18.2-41.4). Esaxerenone demonstrated a direct UACR-lowering effect independent of blood pressure lowering, with only 21.9-28.1% of the total effect mediated by changes in systolic blood pressure and eGFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: