Why the study?
Does H-FABP measurement improve early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain compared to standard cardiac markers?
Does H-FABP measurement improve early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain compared to standard cardiac markers?
H-FABP is a highly sensitive early biomarker for acute myocardial infarction, outperforming standard markers within the first 2 hours of presentation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid early AMI detection in chest pain; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in patients with acute chest pain and compare it with standard cardiac markers. Methods: We undertook a prospective evaluation of 100 consecutive patients admitted with acute chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) mass, myoglobin, and H-FABP were determined at presentation and 2, 4, 8–10, and 16–24 hours after presentation. The main outcome measure was the best sensitivity value within 6 hours after symptom onset. Results: H-FABP peak concentration occurred at 8 hours after symptoms onset and was the most sensitive early marker with 79.9% and 98% of patients with AMI identified at presentation and 2 hours after presentation respectively. The sensitivity of all other cardiac markers (CK-MB mass, cTnI, cTnT, and myoglobin) at presentation was < 62%. The negative predictive value of H-FABP (94%) was also superior to other markers within the first 2 hours of presentation. Myoglobin was the second most sensitive early marker at presentation. Peak sensitivity of cTnI, CK-MB mass, and cTnT were present at 4, 8–10, and 8–10 hours respectively after presentation. Conclusion:Combined measurement of H-FABP and cTnI on two occasions during the first 8 hours after symptom onset was sufficiently sensitive and specific for the early diagnosis of most patients with acute MI and may provide advantages over other cardiac marker combinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Hadi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: