Why the study?
Do haemostasis activation markers predict cardiovascular disease?
Do haemostasis activation markers predict cardiovascular disease?
D-dimer is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events, but the prognostic value of other haemostasis activation markers remains to be fully defined.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
D-dimer may refine cardiovascular risk assessment; leaves open the added value of other haemostasis markers.
Recognition of the central role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease has prompted growing interest in the association of haemostatic variables with cardiovascular disease. In investigating the predictive value of haemostasis markers, a promising type of measurement is that of the activation products of coagulation and fibrinolysis: prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), fibrinopeptide A (FPA), soluble fibrin,thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), plasmin-antiplasmin(PAP) complexes and D-dimer. D-dimer was most extensively studied and there is substantial evidence that D-dimer is a strong, consistent predictor of cardiovascular events in the general population and inpatients with cardiovascular disease. Data on other markers are considerably less abundant and more controversial. The prognostic value of these markers remains to be fully defined in future epidemiological and clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stegnar et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: