Why the study?
Does coronary lesion length influence fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary obstructions?
Does coronary lesion length influence fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary obstructions?
In intermediate coronary lesions, lesion length is a significant determinant of fractional flow reserve, independent of the degree of diameter stenosis.
Lesion length may influence FFR in intermediate lesions independent of stenosis; leaves open whether length-adjusted thresholds should guide decisions.
The aim of the study was to assess the effect of coronary lesion length (LL) on fractional flow reserve (FFR) in coronary arteries with intermediate diameter stenosis (DS; 30–60%). Eighty-three patients (89 lesions) with coronary artery disease underwent FFR measurement using a Radi or Volcano pressure wire. Diameter stenosis and LL were determined by quantitative coronary angiography, and the relationship between DS, LL, and FFR was assessed by regression analysis. Seventy-nine lesions had DS between 30 and 60% and were entered into the retrospective analysis. Mean DS and LL were 41.6 (±6.77%) and 9.2 (±6 mm), respectively. Fractional flow reserve ranged from 0.5 to 1.0. Pearson correlation coefficient for FFR vs. LL was 0.42 (P < 0.001). Using FFR = 0.8 as a cut-off point, there was no difference in mean DS between the two subgroups (42 vs. 41.5%, P = NS), while there was a significant difference in the LL (12.39 vs. 7.83 mm, P = 0.002). In intermediate coronary artery lesion, there is a strong inverse correlation between FFR and LL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghamdi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: