Key result
Prehospital aspirin use is linked to ~46% lower odds of RV strain in acute PE.
Why the study?
Aspirin's potential to modulate thromboinflammation and improve outcomes in non-surgical pulmonary embolism patients remains underexplored.
Does prehospital aspirin use improve clinical outcomes in adult patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism?
Case-Control (n=323)
No
Does prehospital aspirin use improve clinical outcomes in adult patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism?
Odds Ratio: 0.536 (95% CI 0.305–0.944)
Absolute Event Rate: 22.2% vs 34.8%
p-value: p=0.029
Prehospital aspirin use in non-surgical patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism is associated with significantly reduced disease severity, shock, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality, suggesting a potential protective thromboinflammatory disease-modifying effect.
Should not yet change practice in acute PE; leaves open whether prehospital aspirin confers benefit in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. Although anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment, aspirin’s potential to modulate thromboinflammation and improve outcomes in non-surgical PE patients remains underexplored. AIM To assess whether prehospital aspirin use is associated with improved outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute PE. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 323 adult patients admitted with computed tomography-confirmed acute PE from January 2020 to December 2023. Patients were stratified according to documented daily aspirin use for ≥ 7 days prior to hospital admission. Primary outcomes included right ventricular strain, intensive care admission, shock, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. Univariate logistic regression was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Total of 323 patients, 90 (27.9%) used aspirin prehospital. Aspirin users were older (74.2 ± 14.3 years vs 66.9 ± 16.7 years, P < 0.001) and had more coronary artery disease. Aspirin use was associated with significantly lower rates of right ventricular strain on computed tomography [22.2% vs 34.8%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.536, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.305-0.944, P = 0.029], Intensive care admission (16.7% vs 28.8%, OR = 0.496, 95%CI: 0.266-0.924, P = 0.025), shock (2.2% vs 9.9%, OR = 0.208, 95%CI: 0.048-0.899, P = 0.021), and in-hospital mortality (3.3% vs 11.6%, OR = 0.260, 95%CI: 0.080-0.889, P = 0.022). CONCLUSION Prehospital aspirin use is associated with reduced severity and mortality in acute PE. These findings support a potential protective role for aspirin and warrant validation in prospective, multicenter trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suresh et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=323). Prehospital aspirin vs. No aspirin was evaluated on Right ventricular strain on computed tomography (OR 0.536, 95% CI 0.305-0.944, p=0.029). Prehospital aspirin use in patients with acute pulmonary embolism was associated with significantly lower odds of right ventricular strain on CT (OR 0.536), ICU admission, shock, and in-hospital mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: