Why the study?
Blood pressure measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and arm shape, prompting assessment of the OptiBP smartphone application across BMI categories.
Does the OptiBP smartphone application accurately measure blood pressure compared to auscultatory reference across different BMI categories?
Does the OptiBP smartphone application accurately measure blood pressure compared to auscultatory reference across different BMI categories?
The OptiBP smartphone application provides blood pressure estimations within ISO limits for mean differences across BMI categories, though precision errors in obese patients slightly exceeded individual-level thresholds.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OptiBP accuracy across BMI groups remains unproven; observational data leaves open reliability for clinical use in obesity.
PURPOSE: Obesity is a clear risk factor for hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and upper arm shape which may affect the accuracy of measurements. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the OptiBP smartphone application for three different body mass index (BMI) categories (normal, overweight and obese). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with a wide range of BP and BMI were recruited at Lausanne University Hospital's hypertension clinic in Switzerland. OptiBP estimated BP by recording an optical signal reflecting light from the participants' fingertips into a smartphone camera. Age, sex and BP distribution were collected to fulfil the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standards. Both auscultatory BP references and OptiBP BP were measured and compared using the simultaneous opposite arms method, as described in the 81060-2:2018 ISO norm. Subgroup analyses were performed for each BMI category. RESULTS: We analyzed 414 recordings from 95 patients: 34 were overweight and 15 were obese. The OptiBP application had a performance acceptance rate of 82%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) differences between the optical BP estimations and the auscultatory reference rates (criterion 1) were respected in all subgroups: SBP mean value was 2.08 (SD 7.58); 1.32 (6.44); -2.29 (5.62) respectively in obese, overweight and normal weight subgroup. For criterion 2, which investigates the precision errors on an individual level, the threshold for systolic BP in the obese group was slightly above the requirement for this criterion. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the OptiBP application is easily applicable to overweight and obese participants. Differences between the reference measure and the OptiBP estimation were within ISO limits (criterion 1). In obese participants, the SD of mean error was outside criterion 2 limits. Whether auscultatory measurement, due to arm morphology or the OptiBP is associated with increasing bias in obese still needs to be studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caillat et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: