Key result
Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes was associated with increased glycemic variability, including higher CONGA and greater time in hyperglycemia.
Why the study?
Cardiac autonomic neuropathy has been suggested to be associated with hypoglycemia and impaired hypoglycemia unawareness, prompting assessment of its relationship with extensive glucose variability measures in diabetes.
Is cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy associated with increased glycemic variability in patients with diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
Is cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy associated with increased glycemic variability in patients with diabetes?
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes is associated with increased glycemic variability driven primarily by greater time spent in hyperglycemia rather than hypoglycemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for CAN-glycemic variability links in diabetes; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Aim Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) has been suggested to be associated with hypoglycemia and impaired hypoglycemia unawareness. We have assessed the relationship between CAN and extensive measures of glucose variability (GV) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Methods Participants with diabetes underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to obtain measures of GV and the extent of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia and cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing. Results Of the 40 participants (20 T1DM and 20 T2DM) (aged 40.70 ± 13.73 years, diabetes duration 14.43 ± 7.35 years, HbA1c 8.85 ± 1.70%), 23 (57.5%) had CAN. Despite a lower coefficient of variation (CV) (31.26 ± 11.87 vs. 40.33 ± 11.03, P = 0.018), they had a higher CONGA (8.42 ± 2.58 vs. 6.68 ± 1.88, P = 0.024) with a lower median LBGI (1.60 (range: 0.20–3.50) vs. 4.90 (range: 3.20–7.40), P = 0.010) and percentage median time spent in hypoglycemia (4 (range:4–13) vs. 1 (range:0–5), P = 0.008), compared to those without CAN. The percentage GRADE Euglycemia (3.30 ± 2.78 vs. 5.69 ± 3.09, P = 0.017) and GRADE Hypoglycemia (0.3 (range: 0 – 3.80) vs. 1.8 (range: 0.9–6.5), P = 0.036) were significantly lower, while the percentage median GRADE Hyperglycemia (95.45 (range:93–98) vs. 91.6 (82.8–95.1), P = 0.013) was significantly higher in participants with CAN compared to those without CAN. Conclusion CAN was associated with increased glycemic variability with less time in euglycemia attributed to a greater time in hyperglycemia but not hypoglycemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gad et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes (n=40). Cardiac autonomic neuropathy vs. No cardiac autonomic neuropathy was evaluated on Continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA) (p=0.024). Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes was associated with increased glycemic variability, including higher CONGA and greater time in hyperglycemia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: