Key result
The H2FPEF-score was an independent predictor for the development of heart failure within 6 months after TIPS placement (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.23; p>0.01).
Why the study?
Heart failure following TIPS placement carries high mortality, but currently no parameters can predict post-TIPS heart failure.
Does the H2FPEF-score and pre-procedural echocardiographic parameters predict the development of post-TIPS heart failure in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Cohort (n=52)
No
Does the H2FPEF-score and pre-procedural echocardiographic parameters predict the development of post-TIPS heart failure in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Odds Ratio: 1.14 (95% CI 1.05–1.23)
p-value: p=>0.01
The H2FPEF-score is an independent predictor of heart failure development within 6 months after TIPS placement, suggesting its potential utility for pre-procedural risk stratification.
Diastolic dysfunction and STE parameters may identify post-TIPS HF risk; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background/aim of the study Heart failure (HF) as a consequence of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) placement is associated with high mortality. Currently, no parameters can predict heart failure post-TIPS. This study evaluates the value of clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters, including speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and hemodynamic forces (HDF), to predict development of post-TIPS HF. Methods This monocentre, retrospective study included patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing TIPS-placement and available echocardiogram prior to procedure. Two-dimensional STE and HDF measurements were performed using dedicated software. Post-TIPS HF was defined as new clinical signs of cardiac congestion post-TIPS. A logistic regression was performed to assess clinical predictors. Results Fifty-two patients were included of whom 23 (44 %) developed post-TIPS HF within six months post-TIPS (30[15;128]days). No association was observed between STE and HDF and HF development, except for a trend for lower left atrial reservoir strain (OR:0.937[0.864;1.017], p = 0.120) and higher diastolic hemodynamic work (OR:2.301[0.800;6.62], p = 0.122). Logistic regression showed that the H 2 FPEF-score (OR:1.14[1.05;1.23], p > 0.01) is a predictor for HF-development post-TIPS. Conclusions The H 2 FPEF-score is an independent predictor of HF development within 6 months post-TIPS. Further research is necessary to determine whether screening for diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF, using the H2FPEF-score, can help identify those TIPS candidates at increased risk of post-procedural HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venner et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Liver cirrhosis undergoing TIPS-placement (n=52). H2FPEF-score was evaluated on Development of post-TIPS heart failure (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.23, p=>0.01). The H2FPEF-score was an independent predictor for the development of heart failure within 6 months after TIPS placement (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.23; p>0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: