Key result
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness in women did not attenuate hemodynamic responses to psychological stress, but rather resulted in significantly greater heart rate, pulse interval, and left ventricular ejection time responses compared to lower fit women.
Why the study?
Does higher cardiorespiratory fitness attenuate hemodynamic responses to acute psychological stress in healthy women aged 30-50 years?
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
No
Does higher cardiorespiratory fitness attenuate hemodynamic responses to acute psychological stress in healthy women aged 30-50 years?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness in women does not attenuate cardiovascular responsivity to psychological stress, and may actually be associated with larger heart rate responses compared to lower fit women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher fitness may not blunt—and could heighten—hemodynamic stress responses in women; hypothesis-generating for exercise effects on reactivity.
According to the 'cross stressor adaptation hypothesis', regular exercise acts as a buffer against the detrimental effects of stress. Nevertheless, evidence that higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness moderate hemodynamic responses to acute psychological stress is inconclusive, especially in women. Women aged 30-50 years (in the mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle) with higher (n = 17) and lower (n = 17) levels of fitness were subjected to a Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Continuous, non-invasive measurements were made of beat-to-beat, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), left ventricular ejection time (LVET), maximum slope, pulse interval (PI) and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Maximal oxygen consumption was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the 'higher fit' women. Lower fit women had higher fasting glucose, resting heart rate, waist to hip ratios and elevated serum triglyceride and cholesterol/ HDL ratios compared with higher fit women (p<0.05 for all). While all measured parameters (for both groups)displayed significant (p<0.001) responses to the TSST, only HR, PI and LVET differed significantly between higher and lower fit women (p<0.001 for all) with the higher fit women having the larger response in each case. It was also found that higher fit women had significantly shorter time to recovery for maximum slope compared with the lower fit women. These findings provide little support for the notion that higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness result in lower cardiovascular responsivity to psychological stress in women but may indicate that lower fit women have blunted responses to stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayasinghe et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=34). Higher cardiorespiratory fitness vs. Lower cardiorespiratory fitness was evaluated on Hemodynamic responses to psychological stress (HR, PI, LVET) (p=<0.001). Higher cardiorespiratory fitness in women did not attenuate hemodynamic responses to psychological stress, but rather resulted in significantly greater heart rate, pulse interval, and left ventricular ejection time responses compared to lower fit women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: