Why the study?
Previous data showed wide regional variation across Japan in elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease compared to uniform AMI PCI, but contemporary data remain limited.
There is significant geographic disparity in the volume of non-AMI PCI compared to AMI PCI across Japan, which correlates with the density of PCI-capable centers.
Persistent elective PCI variation across regions merits appropriateness review; reinforces prior observations without clarifying drivers.
BACKGROUND: A previous study demonstrated that the per capita volume of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was relatively uniform across the 47 prefectures in Japan, while elective PCIs for stable coronary artery disease showed wide regional variation. However, contemporary data remain limited. METHODS: The Japanese PCI (J-PCI) is a nationwide prospective registry covering most of the procedures performed within the country. PCI procedures in 2019 and 2023 were included and divided according to the indications: AMI versus non-AMI. The patterns of PCI procedures performed for AMI and non-AMI across all prefectures in Japan were evaluated. The associations of the non-AMI/AMI ratio with population, area, and the number of PCI-capable centers per prefecture were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 494,746 PCI procedures were analyzed. The ratios between the highest and lowest prefectures were 4.0-fold in non-AMI and 1.9-fold in AMI in 2019 and 4.2-fold in non-AMI and 2.0-fold in AMI in 2023. The non-AMI/AMI ratio was positively correlated with the ratios of the number of PCI-capable centers to population and area per prefecture. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic disparity was observed in the relative volume of PCI performed for AMI compared to non-AMI across Japan, potentially reflecting variations in the density of PCI-capable centers relative to the area and population of each prefecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: