Key result
High hospital physician density was significantly associated with increased use of percutaneous coronary intervention among older patients with acute coronary syndromes (AOR 2.05).
Why the study?
Regional variation in PCI has been observed in Japan, but small-area and hospital-level variations and the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on PCI use remained unclear.
Observational (n=11,821)
Yes
Effect estimate: AOR 2.05 (95% CI 1.16-3.64)
p-value: p=0.014
Hospital-level variation in PCI use among older patients with ACS in Japan is significant and strongly associated with physician density, highlighting the need for balanced healthcare resource allocation.
Physician density may drive PCI variation in older ACS; leaves open equity and outcome effects pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: Variation in health care delivery among regions and hospitals has been observed worldwide and reported to have resulted in health inequalities. Regional variation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was previously reported in Japan. This study aimed to assess the small-area and hospital-level variations and to examine the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on the use of PCI. METHODS: Data provided by the Fukuoka Prefecture Latter-stage Elderly Insurance Association was used. There were 11,821 patients aged ≥65 years with acute coronary syndromes who were identified from 2015 to 2017. Three-level multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to quantify the small-area and hospital variations, as well as, to identify the determinants of PCI use. RESULTS: = 0.744) and increased PCI use (MOR = 2.425) at the hospital level. After controlling patient- and hospital-level characteristics, a large proportional change in cluster variance was found at the hospital level (PCV 14.7%). Fixed-effect estimation results showed that females, patients aged ≥80 years old, hypertension and dyslipidemia had significant association with the use of PCI. Hospitals with high physician density had a significantly positive relationship with PCI use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving care in hospitals located in small areas have equitable access to PCI. Hospital-level variation might be originated from the oversupply of physicians. A balanced number of physicians and beds should be taken into consideration during healthcare allocation. A treatment process guideline on PCI targeting older patients is also needed to ensure a more equitable access for healthcare resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndromes (n=11,821). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Medication therapy only was evaluated on Receipt of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) associated with high hospital physician density (AOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.16-3.64, p=0.014). High hospital physician density was significantly associated with increased use of percutaneous coronary intervention among older patients with acute coronary syndromes (AOR 2.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: