Why the study?
It was unclear whether income affects long-term health outcomes for older patients undergoing PCI within a universal health coverage system.
Does low-income status increase the risk of adverse long-term health outcomes in older adults undergoing PCI under universal health coverage?
Cohort (n=5,625)
Does low-income status increase the risk of adverse long-term health outcomes in older adults undergoing PCI under universal health coverage?
Even under universal health coverage, low-income older adults undergoing PCI have a significantly higher risk of long-term mortality, AMI, and stroke compared to high-income patients.
Disparities in post-PCI outcomes persist by income despite universal coverage; supports further research into equity interventions.
This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate whether income affects long-term health outcomes for older patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provided by a universal health coverage system. Data were from the Latter Stage Elderly Healthcare Insurance database in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. A total of 5625 individuals aged ≥65 years who underwent PCI in 2014–2016 were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between income status and the incidence of health outcomes. With a median follow-up of 1095 days, 554 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, 1075 stroke cases, 1690 repeat revascularization cases, and 1094 deaths were observed. Risk of all-cause mortality decreased significantly with increasing income level in both unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models. Patients in the low-income level had a significantly higher rate of AMI (log-rank P = 0.003), stroke (log-rank P = 0.039), and all-cause mortality (log-rank P = 0.001) compared with patients in the high-income level. Observed rates for repeat revascularization also were high in the first year after PCI. In the Japanese universal health setting, low-income patients had a comparatively higher mortality risk after PCI. Poor long-term outcomes might be attributed to patients' baseline characteristics rather than treatment processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=5,625). Low income status vs. High income status was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: