Why the study?
While age is a strong predictor of outcomes after PCI, contemporary data in patients of very advanced age with and without AMI are limited.
Does advanced age increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,454,940)
Yes
Does advanced age increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without acute myocardial infarction?
This nationwide Japanese registry study demonstrates a consistent increase in the age of patients undergoing PCI from 2019 to 2024, with advanced age—especially among nonagenarians—strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality and complications, highlighting the importance of shared decision-making.
Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been established as a widely available procedure for managing patients with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While age is a strong predictor of outcomes after PCI, contemporary data in patients with very advanced age are limited. Purpose To delineate the current practice patterns and clinical outcomes of PCI, with a specific focus on septuagenarians, octogenarians, and nonagenarians with AMI and non-AMI in Japan, a country at the forefront of the global aging crisis. Methods The Japanese PCI (J-PCI) is a nationwide registry covering most of the PCI procedures performed within the country. PCI procedures between 2019 and2024 were included. Patients were divided into four age categories: 20–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90–99 years, and further grouped according to the indications (AMI versus non-AMI). The trends and patterns of PCI procedures, in-hospital mortality, and complications across the age groups were assessed. Results A total of 1,454,940 PCI procedures, with 387,454 (26.6%) and 1,067,486 (73.4%) for AMI and non-AMI, were analyzed. During the study period, the mean age has consistently increased from 71.0 to 72.1 years in the entire study population. Nonagenarians accounted for 3.9% and 1.7% in the AMI and non-AMI cohorts in 2019 and 5.0% and 2.4% in 2024. In both cohorts, the higher age categories were associated with increased risks of in-hospital mortality and complications (Figure). Conclusions Our nationwide study demonstrated a consistent year-on-year increase in the age of patients undergoing PCI, despite a modest annual increase of 0.2–0.3 years, without reaching a plateau. Advanced age was strongly associated with poor outcomes, particularly in nonagenarians, reinforcing the need for shared decision-making in PCI in the oldest-old population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,454,940). Advanced age (70–79, 80–89, and 90–99 years) undergoing PCI vs. Younger age categories (20–69 years) undergoing PCI was evaluated on In-hospital mortality and complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: