Why the study?
To determine whether T1 mapping could monitor dynamic myocardial infarction injury changes and be histologically validated.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping accurately assess and monitor the evolution of myocardial injury in myocardial infarction compared to histology in a porcine model?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping accurately assess and monitor the evolution of myocardial injury in myocardial infarction compared to histology in a porcine model?
CMR T1 mapping and ECV computation provide a noninvasive, histologically validated method to quantitatively monitor the evolution of myocardial injury following myocardial infarction.
T1 mapping may track MI injury evolution in animal models with histologic correlation; leaves open clinical translation pending human studies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether T1 mapping could monitor the dynamic changes of injury in myocardial infarction (MI) and be histologically validated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 22 pigs, MI was induced by ligating the left anterior descending artery and they underwent serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations with modified Look-Locker inversion T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) computation in acute (within 24 hours, n = 22), subacute (7 days, n = 13), and chronic (3 months, n = 7) phases of MI. Masson's trichrome staining was performed for histological ECV calculation. Myocardial native T1 and ECV were obtained by region of interest measurement in infarcted, peri-infarct, and remote myocardium. RESULTS: < 0.001). CONCLUSION: T1 mapping allows the quantitative assessment of injury in MI and the noninvasive monitoring of tissue injury evolution, which correlates well with histological findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: