Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome associate with subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with normal coronary arteries?
Does metabolic syndrome associate with subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with normal coronary arteries?
Metabolic syndrome is associated with subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with normal coronary arteries, which can be detected using speckle tracking echocardiography.
Supports metabolic syndrome association with subclinical dysfunction on strain imaging; hypothesis-generating, does not support practice change.
BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MetS), as a combination of cardiovascular risk factors, is associated with subclinical cardiovascular diseases. We sought to evaluate the subclinical myocardial dysfunctions using echocardiography in patients with normal coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed 50 consecutive patients with angiographically-proven normal coronary arteries and a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) ≥55%. The diagnosis of MetS was based on the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. All patients were examined using conventional and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for evaluating the myocardial functions. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 52.3 ± 8.3 years with 32 females (64%). LV EF, mass index, and full volume were comparable between groups. The LV myocardial performance index (0.40 ± 0.13 vs. 0.32 ± 0.10; P = .027), global longitudinal strain (GLS, -15.8 ± 4.5 vs. -19.7 ± 2.1; P < .001), and global circumferential strain (-17.9 ± 6.1 vs. -21.5 ± 3.3; P = .014) were different between patients with or without MetS, respectively. The GLS discriminated patients with MetS (area under the curve = 0.837, sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In MetS without coronary artery disease, echocardiography demonstrated subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samiei et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: