Why the study?
Does oral clonidine compared to oral midazolam improve preoperative sedation and attenuate laryngoscopic stress response (BP and HR changes) in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Does oral clonidine compared to oral midazolam improve preoperative sedation and attenuate laryngoscopic stress response (BP and HR changes) in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Oral midazolam provides superior preoperative sedation while clonidine better attenuates intubation hemodynamics; supports goal-directed premedication choice in GA.
Context: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is associated detrimental hemodynamic changes like rise in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) leading to adverse cardiological outcome specially in susceptible individuals. Aims: To compare the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) changes during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation as well as to evaluate the preoperative sedation status between oral clonidine and oral midazolam as premedication for the patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA). Settings and Design: Fifty patients between 18 and 60 years of age of either sex of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II undergoing GA were randomly divided into two equal groups of 25 patients each. Group-C patients received clonidine 4 mcg/kg orally and Group-M patients received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam orally as premedication. Materials and Methods: After measuring baseline hemodynamic parameters patients of both groups received premedication. Preoperative sedation was assessed 2 hr after premedication administration. Standard anesthetic technique was followed. Hemodynamic (HR, BP) parameters were noted baseline, immediately after laryngoscopy and intubation and 5 min after intubation to observe the stress response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: