Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate and meta-analyze the association of clinic and daytime, nighttime, and 24-h blood pressure with the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Does ambulatory blood pressure predict new-onset atrial fibrillation better than clinic blood pressure?
Does ambulatory blood pressure predict new-onset atrial fibrillation better than clinic blood pressure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ambulatory systolic blood pressure is a stronger predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation than clinic blood pressure.
The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the association of clinic and daytime, nighttime, and 24-h blood pressure with the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation. We conducted a literature search through PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in relation to the above-mentioned blood pressure parameters and reporting adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. We identified five studies. The pooled population consisted of 7224 patients who experienced 444 cases of atrial fibrillation. The overall adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.05 (0.98-1.13), 1.19 (1.11-1.27), 1.18 (1.11-1.26), and 1.23 (1.14-1.32), per 10-mmHg increment in clinic, daytime, nighttime, and 24-h systolic blood pressure, respectively. The degree of heterogeneity of the hazard ratio estimates across the studies (Q and I-squared statistics) were minimal. The results of this meta-analysis strongly suggest that ambulatory systolic blood pressure prospectively predicts incident atrial fibrillation better than does clinic systolic blood pressure and that daytime, nighttime, and 24-h systolic blood pressure are similarly associated with future atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coccina et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: