Why the study?
To compare acoustic radiation force impulse elastography values of renal cortical parenchyma between children with acute glomerulonephritis and healthy children, and determine a diagnostic cut-off point.
Does acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI-e) accurately differentiate children with acute glomerulonephritis from healthy children?
Does acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI-e) accurately differentiate children with acute glomerulonephritis from healthy children?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ARFI elastography values are significantly higher in children with acute glomerulonephritis, suggesting it may serve as a non-invasive auxiliary method for early diagnosis.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI-e) values of the renal cortical parenchyma in children with acute glomerulonephritis (AGN) and healthy children, and to determine a cut-off point for the diagnosis of AGN. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 children with biopsy-proven AGN and 30 healthy children. All the children underwent renal ARFI-e measurements. Values were obtained from the upper, middle, and lower zones of the right kidney parenchyma. A total of nine ARFI-e measurements (three from each zone) were made. Statistical analyses were conducted of the mean elastography values (MEVs) of the children in both groups. RESULTS: In the patient group, the MEVs measured from the upper, middle and lower zones of the right kidney were 3.42±0.42 m/s, 3.45±0.45 m/s, and 3.39±0.39 m/s (average, 3.42±0.34 m/s), respectively. In the healthy control group, the MEVs measured from the upper, middle, and lower zones of the right kidney were 2.85±0.63 m/s, 2.85±0.68 m/s, and 2.86±0.66 m/s (average, 2.85±0.57 m/s), respectively. The MEVs in all zones were significantly higher in the patient group than in the healthy group (P<0.001). The cut-off values determined to predict AGN in the upper, middle, and lower zones of the kidney were 2.74 m/s (sensitivity, 96.67%; specificity, 46.67%), 2.71 m/s (sensitivity, 96.67%; specificity, 53.33%), and 2.81 m/s (sensitivity, 93.33%; specificity, 56.67%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ARFI-e technique can be considered as a non-invasive, easily applicable, auxiliary method for the early diagnosis of AGN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoǧurtçuoǧlu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: