Why the study?
Is a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay more sensitive than microneutralization for detecting group B coxsackievirus IgM?
Population
Patients culture positive for group B coxsackieviruses infections and hepatitis A IgM-positive sera
Comparison
Solid-phase enzyme immunoassay with capture… vs Standard microneutralization test and…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
EIA may speed CBV IgM detection in suspected cases; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Is a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay more sensitive than microneutralization for detecting group B coxsackievirus IgM?
An IgM capture enzyme immunoassay is more rapid and sensitive than standard microneutralization for diagnosing group B coxsackievirus infections.
Chan et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: