Why the study?
Does AT1-receptor blockade normalize the renal vasodilator response to D1-like receptor stimulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Does AT1-receptor blockade normalize the renal vasodilator response to D1-like receptor stimulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats?
AT1-receptor blockade normalizes the blunted renal vasodilator response to D1-like receptor stimulation in spontaneously hypertensive rats, suggesting RAAS involvement in this abnormal hemodynamic regulation.
Suggests RAAS involvement in blunted renal vasodilation in hypertension; leaves open clinical translation beyond rat models.
BACKGROUND: We previously showed that the renal vasodilator response to a D1-like receptor agonist is blunted in conscious SHR compared with WKY rats. The mechanism of this impaired dopaminergic responsiveness in SHR is unclear. An altered balance between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the dopaminergic system may be involved. To determine the interaction between the RAAS and the dopaminergic system in the blunted D1-like responsiveness in SHR, we studied the renal vasodilator response to the D1-like receptor agonist fenoldopam before and after 7 days of pretreatment with the AT1-receptor antagonist (AT1-A) L158,809 in conscious SHR and WKY rats. METHODS: Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) was measured by the clearance of I-hippuran. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via an intraarterial catheter. RESULTS: Without pretreatment, MAP was reduced to comparable degrees by fenoldopam in WKY (-7 +/- 4%, ns) and SHR (-6 +/- 1%, P < 0.05). However, ERPF was significantly more increased (P < 0.006) by fenoldopam in WKY (+26 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001) than in SHR (+2 +/- 2%, ns). AT1-A treatment reduced MAP and increased ERPF and glomerular filtration rate significantly in both strains. Pretreatment with AT1-A significantly potentiated the fenoldopam-induced rise in ERPF in SHR, but not in WKY, without affecting the blood pressure responses in either strain. As a result, during pretreatment with an AT1-A, the rise in ERPF by fenoldopam was similar in both strains (SHR +25 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001; WKY +33 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the RAAS accounts for the blunted renal vasodilator response to a D1-like receptor agonist in SHR. A dysbalance between the dopaminergic system and the RAAS may be involved in the abnormal renal hemodynamic regulation in SHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vries et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: