Key result
Continued use of a smartphone-based personal health record for 6 months resulted in a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure and LDL-C levels compared to patients who discontinued.
Why the study?
Data on the efficacy of smartphone-based personal health records in patients with cardiovascular disease were limited.
Does a smartphone-based personal health record system improve cardiovascular risk markers in patients with heart failure or coronary artery disease?
Does a smartphone-based personal health record system improve cardiovascular risk markers in patients with heart failure or coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smartphone-based personal health records may improve systolic blood pressure and LDL-C in patients with HF or CAD who remain engaged, though maintaining long-term adherence is challenging.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the efficacy of smartphone-based personal health records (PHRs) in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to examine the processes, outcomes and challenges associated with the implementation of integrated PHRs in patients with heart failure (HF) or coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: This prospective single-group study evaluated the effects of a PHR system with the capability to capture electronic health records and vital signs in patients with HF or CAD. The outcomes measured were the 6 -month changes in blood pressure (BP), body weight (BW), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, lipid profiles and haemoglobin (Hb) A1c levels. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and March 2022, we enrolled 111 patients (median age: 61 years and 47% women) with CAD and/or HF. Over 6 months, the PHR review count distribution was skewed: median 749 times (lowest 2, highest 5724)/180 days, suggesting both low and excessive PHR users. After 3 days, 23% of the patients discontinued inputting their vital signs and medication status. At 6 months, compared with patients who discontinued, those who continued to input their vital signs (N = 86) showed a significant decrease in their systolic BP and LDL-C levels but not in the diastolic BP, BW, BNP, HDL-C, triglyceride or HbA1c levels. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of smartphone-based PHRs in daily practice is challenging for patients with HF or CAD. However, we observed positive indications of the benefits of PHR in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000044369.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nochioka et al. (2024) studied Heart failure or coronary artery disease (n=111). Smartphone-based personal health records (PHRs) vs. Patients who discontinued inputting their vital signs was evaluated on 6-month changes in blood pressure, body weight, BNP, lipid profiles and HbA1c levels. Continued use of a smartphone-based personal health record for 6 months resulted in a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure and LDL-C levels compared to patients who discontinued.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: