Why the study?
Does an efficient entire-capsid-coding-region amplification method improve the direct detection of poliovirus from stool extracts compared to cell culture?
Does an efficient entire-capsid-coding-region amplification method improve the direct detection of poliovirus from stool extracts compared to cell culture?
The developed entire-capsid-coding-region amplification method enables highly efficient, direct detection of poliovirus from stool extracts without the need for cell culture.
May enable cell culture-free poliovirus detection from stool; leaves open validation for surveillance programs.
Laboratory diagnosis has played a critical role in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative since 1988, by isolating and identifying poliovirus (PV) from stool specimens by using cell culture as a highly sensitive system to detect PV. In the present study, we aimed to develop a molecular method to detect PV directly from stool extracts, with a high efficiency comparable to that of cell culture. We developed a method to efficiently amplify the entire capsid coding region of human enteroviruses (EVs) including PV. cDNAs of the entire capsid coding region (3.9 kb) were obtained from as few as 50 copies of PV genomes. PV was detected from the cDNAs with an improved PV-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR system and nucleotide sequence analysis of the VP1 coding region. For assay validation, we analyzed 84 stool extracts that were positive for PV in cell culture and detected PV genomes from 100% of the extracts (84/84 samples) with this method in combination with a PV-specific extraction method. PV could be detected in 2/4 stool extract samples that were negative for PV in cell culture. In PV-positive samples, EV species C viruses were also detected with high frequency (27% [23/86 samples]). This method would be useful for direct detection of PV from stool extracts without using cell culture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arita et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: