Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 1992Journal of Cardiac SurgeryOpen Access

Effect of Immunological Differences on Rat Aortic Valve Allograft Calcification

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does the degree of immunological difference between donor and recipient affect the calcification of aortic valve allografts in adult Lewis rats?

Population

Adult Lewis rats receiving aortic valve allografts transplanted heterotopically into the abdominal aorta

Comparison

Allogeneic aortic valve allografts from donors… vs Syngeneic aortic valve allografts from Lewis…

Design

Preclinical

Follow-up

3-12 weeks

Authors

FLFlavian M. LupinettiUniversity of IowaSCSandra CobbDuke UniversityHKHans C. Kioschos

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports immunological mismatch in rat valve calcification; leaves open human allograft relevance.

Structured PICO

Does the degree of immunological difference between donor and recipient affect the calcification of aortic valve allografts in adult Lewis rats?

P
Population
Adult Lewis rats receiving aortic valve allografts transplanted heterotopically into the abdominal aorta
I
Intervention
Allogeneic aortic valve allografts from donors with varying degrees of allogenicity (F344, LBN F1, and Brown Norway strains)
C
Comparator
Syngeneic aortic valve allografts from Lewis donors
O
Outcome
Calcium content of one leaflet evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersion x-ray microanalysis at 3-12 weeks following transplantationsurrogate

Syngeneic aortic valve allografts calcify significantly less than allogeneic grafts, though the degree of allogenicity does not further influence the magnitude of calcification.

Cite This Study

Lupinetti et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7dfd2b4776ec6335187e9chttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1992.tb00776.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ANTIGENICITY OF FRESH AND CRYOPRESERVED RAT VALVE ALLOGRAFTS1990 · 63 citations
  2. 2Antigenicity of Aortic Valve Allografts1973 · 38 citations
  3. 3MONOCUSP AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN DOGS: AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL1983 · 2 citations
  4. 4Inhibition by diphosphonate compounds of calcification of porcine bioprosthetic heart valve cusps implanted subcutaneously in rats.1985 · 75 citations
  5. 5Endothelium-derived relaxing factor and coronary vasospasm.1989 · 419 citations