Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low NT-proBNP levels.
Do low NT-proBNP levels (<300 ng/L) predict better prognosis compared to elevated levels in patients hospitalized with HFpEF?
Do low NT-proBNP levels (<300 ng/L) predict better prognosis compared to elevated levels in patients hospitalized with HFpEF?
In patients hospitalized with HFpEF, low NT-proBNP levels (<300 ng/L) are relatively common (13.7%) and are associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation compared to elevated levels.
Low NT-proBNP in 14% of HFpEF hospitalizations warrants diagnostic caution; leaves open prognostic implications and management needs in this subgroup.
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and low N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Seven hundred ninety consecutive patients hospitalized with HFpEF from 2006 to 2017 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between low NT-proBNP group (<300 ng/L) and elevated NT-proBNP group (≥300 ng/L). 108 HFpEF patients (13.7%) presented with low NT-proBNP levels. Age, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association functional class, and albumin were independent predictors of low NT-proBNP levels in HFpEF patients. During the median follow-up duration of 1103 days, 11 patients (10.2%) in low NT-proBNP group suffered from primary endpoint event. Elevated NT-proBNP group had a higher risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation than low NT-proBNP group (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 2.36 [1.24,4.49], P = .009). Stratified analyses showed that the association between NT-proBNP (elevated NT-proBNP group vs low NT-proBNP group) and risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation was stronger in non-atrial fibrillation patients than in atrial fibrillation patients (P value for interaction = .025). Furthermore, the associations between NT-proBNP and risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation were stronger in younger and male patients than in older and female patients. However, both subgroups only reached borderline significant (P values for interaction = .062 and .084, respectively). Our findings suggest that low NT-proBNP levels were common in patients hospitalized with HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF and low NT-proBNP levels had a better prognosis than those with elevated NT-proBNP levels, particularly in younger, male, and non-atrial fibrillation patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: